You are here: Home > articles > Shares > Don’t Get Ruined by These 10 Popular Investment Myths (Part VI)
Don’t Get Ruined by These 10 Popular Investment Myths (Part VI)
October 14, 2014 2:34 pmVideo
Latest News
- Forecast for GBP/USD on May 10, 2024 May 10, 2024
- Forecast for AUD/USD on May 10, 2024 May 10, 2024
- Outlook for GBP/USD on May 10. The British pound failed. Or it simply refused May 10, 2024
- Outlook for EUR/USD on May 10. The euro went up for no reason May 10, 2024
- The US dollar stumbled again May 10, 2024
- The euro got away with it May 10, 2024
- Video market update for May 09, 2024 May 9, 2024
- Analysis of EUR/USD pair on May 9th. Euro woke up after the Bank of England meeting May 9, 2024
- Analysis of GBP/USD pair on May 9th. Andrew Bailey did all he could May 9, 2024
- USD/JPY: Simple trading tips for novice traders for May 9th (US session) May 9, 2024
- GBP/USD: Simple trading tips for novice traders for May 9th (US session) May 9, 2024
- EUR/USD: Simple trading tips for novice traders for May 9th (US session) May 9, 2024
- Technical Analysis – GBPUSD retreats further after BoE’s decision May 9, 2024
- Technical Analysis – UK 100 index swings to all-time high May 9, 2024
- GBP/USD: trading plan for the US session on May 9th (analysis of morning deals). The pound continues to be held within the May 9, 2024
- EUR/USD: trading plan for the US session on May 9th (analysis of morning deals). The euro rebounded from 1.0726 May 9, 2024
- EUR/USD. May 9th. Bulls have exhausted their strength May 9, 2024
- GBP/USD. May 9th. Bulls fear Bailey’s “soft” rhetoric May 9, 2024
- Midweek Technical Look – EURUSD, Gold, US 500 May 9, 2024
- Technical Analysis – EURCHF flirts with uptrend line May 9, 2024
You may remember that after the 2008-2009 crash, many called into question traditional economic models. Why did they fail?
And more importantly, will they warn us of a new approaching doomsday, should there be one?
This series gives you a well-researched answer. Here is Part VI; come back soon for Part VII.
Myth #6: “Wars are bullish/bearish for stocks.”
By Robert Prechter (excerpted from the monthly Elliott Wave Theorist; published since 1979)
… If the stock market is not reflecting macroeconomic realities, what else could it possibly be doing? Well, how about political news? Maybe political events trump macroeconomic events.
It is common for economists to offer a forecast for the stock market yet add a caveat to the effect that “If a war shock or terrorist attack occurs, then I would have to modify my outlook.”
For such statements to have any validity, there must be a relationship between war, peace and terrorist attacks on the one hand and the stock market on the other. Surely, since economists say these things, we can assume that they must have access to a study showing that such events affect the stock market, right?
The answer is no, for the same reason that they do not check relationships between interest rates, oil prices or the trade balance and the stock market. The causality just seems too sensible to doubt.
Claim #6: “Wars are bullish/bearish for stock prices.”
Observe in the form of this claim that you have a choice for the outcome of the event. Economists have in fact argued both sides of this one. Some have held that war stimulates the economy, because the government spends money furiously and induces companies to gear up for production of war materials. Makes sense.
Others have argued that war hurts the economy because it diverts resources from productive enterprise, not to mention that is usually ends up destroying cities, factories and capital goods. Hmm; that makes sense, too.
I will not take sides here. We can negate both cases just by looking at a few charts.
Figure 11 shows a time of war when stock values rose, then fell.
Figure 12 shows a time of war when stock values fell, then rose.
Figure 13 shows a time when stock values rose throughout.
Figure 14 shows a time when stock values fell throughout.
Who wins the war seems to mean little, either. A group of Allies won World War I as stock values reached 14-year lows; and nearly the same group of Allies won World War II as stock values neared 14-year highs.
Given such conflicting relationships, why and how, exactly, does an economist expect war to affect his economic forecasts?
(Stay tuned for Part VII of this important series, where Prechter examines another popular investment myth: Namely, that “Peace is bullish for stocks.”)