“The Dow rose nearly 1 percent Thursday… Investors
were encouraged by a report that the United States trade
deficit had narrowed, one positive point in a recent string
of weak economic data.” (June 9, 2011, Reuters)
Before you join the crowd in thinking that shrinking trade
gap is bullish for stocks, read this excerpt from the 2011
edition of our popular free Club EWI resource, The
Independent Investor eBook.
*****
Over the past 30 years, hundreds of articles — you can
find them on the web — have featured comments from economists
about the worrisome nature of the U.S. trade deficit. It
seems to be a reasonable thing to worry about. But has it
been correct to assume throughout this time that an expanding
trade deficit impacts the economy negatively? Figure 8 answers
this question in the negative.
In fact, had these economists reversed their statements
and expressed relief whenever the trade deficit began to
expand and concern whenever it began to shrink, they would
have accurately negotiated the ups and downs of the stock
market and the economy over the past 35 years. The relationship,
if there is one, is precisely the opposite of the one they
believe is there. Over the span of these data, there in
fact has been a positive — not negative — correlation
between the stock market and the trade deficit.
It is no good saying, “Well, it will bring on a problem
eventually.” Anyone who can see the relationship shown
in the data would be far more successful saying that once
the trade deficit starts shrinking, it will bring on a problem.
Whether or not you assume that these data indicate a causal
relationship between economic health and the trade deficit,
it is clear that the “reasonable” assumption
upon which most economists have relied throughout this time
is 100% wrong.
Around 1998, articles began quoting a minority of economists
who — probably after looking at a graph such as Figure 8
— started arguing the opposite claim. Fitting all our examples
so far, they were easily able to reverse the exogenous-cause
argument and have it still sound sensible. It goes like this:
In the past 30 years, when the U.S. economy has expanded,
consumers have used their money and debt to purchase goods
from overseas in greater quantity than foreigners were purchasing
goods from U.S. producers. Prosperity brings more spending,
and recession brings less. So a rising U.S. economy coincides
with a rising trade deficit, and vice versa. Sounds reasonable!
But once again there is a subtle problem. If you examine
the graph closely, you will see that peaks in the trade deficit preceded recessions
in every case, sometimes by years, so one cannot blame recessions
for a decline in the deficit. Something is still wrong with
the conventional style of reasoning.
*****
the expanded, 2011 edition of our popular free Club EWI
resource, The Independent Investor eBook.
All you need is to create a free Club EWI profile. Here’s
what else you’ll learn:
- Why QE2 was a major tactical error
- Why interest rates don’t drive stock prices.
- Why rising oil prices are not bearish for stocks.
- Why earnings don’t drive stock prices.
- What inflation has to do with the prices of gold and
silver
- Why central banks don’t control the markets.
- Much more — 51 pages in all
Keep reading the free
Independent Investor eBook now — all you need
is a free Club EWI membership.
Think Lower Trade Deficit Is Bullish For the Stock Market? Now See This Chart
U.S. trade gap narrowed in April, and many will see that as a bullish sign
June 10, 2011
By Elliott Wave International
This
article was syndicated by Elliott Wave International and
was originally published under the headline Think Lower Trade Deficit Is Bullish For the Stock Market? Now See This Chart.
EWI is the world’s largest market forecasting firm. Its staff
of full-time analysts led by Chartered Market Technician
Robert Prechter provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to
institutional and private investors around the world.
Disclaimer: Please note all prices are for information only, they should not be relied upon for accuracy or trading. All prices quotes are based on CFD prices and are similar though not always identical to real exchange prices. STOCKTRKR or anybody connected with STOCKTRKR will not accept any liability for loss or damage arising from use of any information/commentary/charts or articles which is provided 'as is' for educational purposes only, nothing contained on this website should be considered as investment advice - please seek proper investment advice from registered financial broker or institution if you wish to trade on global markets and ensure you are familiar with the risks.